Mesmeric Control
Spell Normal

Mesmeric Control

  • View:
  • 4182




During your opponent's next turn after you activate this card, your opponent cannot change the battle positions of monsters, except with a card effect.




 
 
AI Power Analysis
Floodgate/ControlConfidence: MediumEvaluated Oct 6, 2026
33± 6/ 100
Power Score
Intrinsic 39
Deck 33

Mesmeric Control — Power Evaluation

Final Score: 33 ± 6 · Confidence: Medium

  • Intrinsic: 39 · Deck: 33 · Meta: provisional
  • Primary role: Floodgate/Control

Why it scores here

Mesmeric Control is a soft floodgate that restricts position changes for one turn, but only in decks where the opponent's position-switching strategy matters. The card generates no card advantage, builds no boards, and appears in zero recorded combos. With only 2 deck appearances across minimal formats and no guides explaining consistent synergy, the evidence suggests this is a niche tech card with limited practical impact. The one-turn effect window and situational disruption further limit its value.

Axis scores

Axis Score Evidence
Accessibility 40 Spell plays from hand any turn without restriction, but only 2 deck appearances suggest limited adoption across formats (observed).
Combo & Conversion 15 Zero combo boards contain this card; text analysis shows no acceleration or extension capability (verified).
Resource Economy 25 Activation costs 1 card with no card advantage, refuel, or GY synergy returned (verified).
Effect & Interaction 35 Restricts only position changes except by card effect—a soft, situational disruption that many strategies can sidestep (inferred).
Material Utility 0 Normal Spell cards cannot be used as monster material, contributing zero to synchro/xyz/fusion lines (verified).
Resilience & Flexibility 30 One-turn effect with no recursion, redundancy, or multi-zone presence across turns; once applied, it persists but only for the opponent's single turn (inferred).
Deck-Building Efficiency 65 Splashable 1-of with no locks or garnets; clean slot cost but minimal deck demand across the sample suggests marginal value per slot (observed).

Calculation

Weight profile: Floodgate/Control (primary). Intrinsic ≈ 39, Deck ≈ 33, Meta = provisional. Modifiers: Niche disruption target (-2). Final formula: 0.40*Intrinsic + 0.60*Deck

Strengths

  • Clean, splashable spell with no deck restrictions
  • Resolved effect cannot be negated once on-field
  • Works against position-change-reliant strategies

Weaknesses

  • No combo potential or board-building capability
  • One-turn duration; no persistent control
  • Situational disruption—only relevant if opponent changes battle positions
  • Pure −1 with no card advantage or refuel
  • Cannot be used as monster material

Counters / choke points

  • Any strategy that does not rely on position changes
  • Card effects that change positions (explicitly allowed per text)
  • Decks with minimal battle position management

Best use

Floodgate tech / side-deck card. Decks: Decks leveraging position locks or requiring specific battle stance (defensive builds, aggro position-swap chains). Suggested copies: 1.

Evidence & gaps

  • Verified: Card text restricts opponent position changes for one turn, except by card effect; Normal Spell card type (no monster material value); Appears in 2 decks with 1 copy each (deck data); Zero combo boards recorded (combo data); Zero guides mention this card
  • Observed: Deck inclusion: 2 distinct archetypes, 1 copy per deck; Top partner Magical Hats co-appears in 100% of recorded decks; No combos recorded across entire combo database
  • Inferred: Accessibility ~40: playable on-demand spell, but low deck adoption suggests limited demand; Combo conversion ~15: pure disruption with no acceleration or board extension per text; Resource economy ~25: −1 card cost with no advantage generation or recursion; Effect interaction ~35: position changes are situational; many strategies bypass this restriction; Resilience ~30: one-turn effect with no multi-turn persistence or backup lines; Deckbuilding efficiency ~65: splashable with low slot cost, but minimal evidence of consistent value
  • Data gaps: No combo evidence—combo conversion inferred from text only No guides supplied—cannot confirm real-world synergy patterns Only 2 deck samples—very limited archetype diversity No usage statistics (StatisticsCard)—cannot confirm cross-archetype inclusion rates No banlist data—assumed unlimited (3 copies)











https://metaduelist.com/
Top